[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Southwestern Hell Internet Services
My vDSL line had always been rock-steady, so I didn't sweat it even when they consistently double-billed me for four months.
All that changed on 18 Nov 2000, when SBIS unilaterally instituted changes that killed 900 vDSL feeds
in the Richardson, Tx. SBIS knew it was going to happen, and even notified some of their partner companies ahead of time. Did they tell their clients? (Do I have to answer that)?
SBSI Tech Support was, I believe, kept in the dark about all this; they simply did not know what was going on. The best source of information on the problem was to be found from other users in news:swbell.adsl and news:dfw.internet.providers. After 5 days of run-around, one user with a packet sniffer realized the static IP customers had their IPs changed as well; I finally figured out which ones I had and was back online 132 hours after the original outage. Of course, I had to change the IPs on all the servers, change the DNS, change the host information at the InterNIC, etc. A bad, bad experience.
As soon as my contractual obligation to SBIS is over, I'm defecting to august.net.
[original page archived below]
my @home to xDSL experience
I ordered @home from TCI in early 1999, because DSL was not an option at that time.
I had a couple of IPs, and ran the ethernet cable from the modem into the uplink port of the hub.
I had no complaints about the speed. When it works it's fast.
I'm not here to bash @home, but rather to explain why it was a poor choice for me.
The problem is that it wasn't (in my case) very stable. I experienced
minutes-long outages (lost sync) almost every day, a few hours each week,
and usually
a day or two each month. Longest outage was two weeks. This is ok for a
casual user; I work at home and really do need stability. Yes, I know,
@home was designed for light residential rather than business use. I
agree.
Complicating matters was that I was running my linux box
(sendmail, apache, etc) off that network, so I needed greater uptime.
In fact, a 64k ISDN would have been a better choice for me because
I care more about stability than bandwidth. (when I signed up, @home
had no "no server" language in the documentation I signed).
Here is a listing of my complaints:
- massive instability. I started running a script that pinged and recorded downtime. I usually forgot to
run it but you'll get an idea. The cablemodem lost synch so often that
I propped it up so I could see the synch light at all times. My wife
got tired of hearing me say "fscking cable's down again".
- long wait times for tech support (got better in late 1999).
The average wait time for tier 1 support in 1999 was 43 minutes (my
speakerphone has a timer). Shortest was 38 mins, longest was 108 mins.
Then a similar wait for tier 2...
- insane scheduling for onsite techs. The shortest time I was ever
scheduled was 14 days; the longest was 35 days. "yes sir, I know your
feed is completely dead. We'll have someone out there in 35 days".
Can you believe that? I scheduled eight onsite linechecks; every single
time the issued resolved itself before the tech could get there.
- If you say the word "@home" to your local provider they will
immediately transfer you to @home HQ in Boulder. Even if you
know the problem is with the local infrastructure (like you
can see out your window that somebody just backhoed your cable line).
I subscribed to basic cable just so I could tell the local maroons when
their cables were fried. HQ and your local provider cannot communicate
effectively. It's real left-hand/right-hand stuff.
- They would reassign one of more of my IPs every few months. Oopsie!
"Yeah, looks like we handed those out again.... uhhh.... you can request
more from the webpage". True, I mean changing IPs on a workstation
is no big deal. But it screws up my DNS (which I shouldn't be doing
anyway, I know, I know).
- Quite literally the only thing that worked consistently was billing.
SW Bell vDSL
I had DSL installed on 1/16/2000 and it's been very stable, seems at
least as fast as the cablemodem (although the bandwidth is theoretically
smaller on the download side). It costs more, is (theoretically) slower,
and I'm loving every minute of it.
the verdict
@home is probably ok for casual internet users who want speed, and can
tolerate non-trivial amounts of downtime. You will need a
backup ISP of some kind (juno, netzero, etc). Roll with the punches on
outages and just wait them out. Calling tech support will not help and
will only infuriate you and bother the tech.
It's not stable enough to work from home. Don't waste your time or $$$.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]